And the Saga Continues

It looks like the so-called sanctuary finally gave up trying to gain access into my old blog. The animal caretakers from the unregulated, non-inspected property tried for days to locate additional Google cached files, so as to download the posts to their personal computer. Fortunately, I was able to shut down almost all of the cached files, thereby preventing them from reading the rest of my blog. If they really want to know what is going on at the "so-called sanctuary, all they have to do is ask me!

Interesting enough, the so-called sanctuary directors, in an attempt to cover-up what the employees learned from the blog, apparently told the staff that there was a lot of "misinformation" regarding the sanctuary's activities written recently and not to believe everything they read on the Internet.


It would not surprise me in the least of the director told the staff that because of all this "misinformation," the so-called sanctuary plans to "sue me." I say this because the very same tactic was used by the directors back in 2006 when workers and inquiring parties first started questioning the allegations I made to the board of director and to Federal/State agencies. The directors went around telling folks that a TRO (temporary restraining order, which incidentally in the state of Texas can only be filed against a family member or person involved in a domestic violence situation) was filed against me and that they were in the process of suing me (ho hum).


So....here we go again. I believe the directors use this "threat" (1) because they don't want the staff or others to know the truth of what is going on at the so-called sanctuary for fear they may speak out; and (2) it keeps the staff in line and fearful that if they cooperate with outside agencies, they too may be sued.


It explains why the pseudo-sanctuary's attorney and "directors" use the USDA/APHIS inspector's and OAG assistant attorney's first name in outgoing correspondences, telephone conversations, and in person-- clearly it gives the impression to the staff that the USDA and OAG are on their side and not on the side of the complainant.

I cannot imagine what sort of pressure the workers must be feeling right now. If there are any honorable workers in the group, hopefully they will contact the OAG or the USDA and request historical documents on this place, so they can see for themselves I am telling the truth. But, then again, if they were honorable workers, they wouldn't be working at this place, right? And so the saga continues another day...